Full record

Hitmarkets

The US stock market does not experience a fundamental decline in 2025

A scored prediction by Tom Nash, made on .

VideoQuote from the original sourcemarkets

Scored prediction

Hitmarkets

based on all these factors I'm looking at I'm not seeing anything that might send the stock market down in 2025 fundamentally

The US stock market does not experience a fundamental decline in 2025

Made on
2025-01-15
Outcome
Hit
Importance
4 / 5
Effect on score
+3.82

What counted as right

Status
resolved
Settled on
2025-12-31

The S&P 500 finishes 2025 at or above its 2025-01-15 level (no fundamentally-driven annual decline).

Prediction (US market does not suffer a fundamental annual decline in 2025; finishes at/above 2025-01-15 level) is borne out: 6,845.50 close is well above 5,937.34. Note an intra-year drawdown (April 2025 tariff-driven selloff, S&P fell to ~5,569) that fully recovered; the criterion is an annual-close comparison, which the index cleared comfortably.

Sources

  • A Once in a Lifetime Financial Event Is Here

    YouTube ·

    Source

Evidence of what happened

  • S&P 500 level on 2025-01-15 (the made_on date) was 5,937.34.

    Evidence

  • S&P 500 closed 2025 at 6,845.50 on 2025-12-31, a +16.39% price / +17.88% total-return year, its third straight double-digit annual gain, finishing ~15% above the 2025-01-15 level.

    Evidence

Corrections

No public corrections.

Effect on the score

+3.82
How sure they sounded
85%
Outcome
Hit
Importance
4 / 5

This page shows the scored prediction as published; the site doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Where this came from

The US stock market does not experience a fundamental decli…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
August 2, 2026
Made on
2025-01-15

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodologyPrivacy