Full record

Hitmarkets

US stocks bottom during the week of 29 November 2021 and stage a V-shaped rebound, rallying into year-end 2021.

A scored prediction by Tom Lee, made on .

TVQuoted directly by a news outletmarkets

Scored prediction

Hitmarkets

We would be aggressive buyers of this pullback. As with the case for Beta and Delta variants, the 'bark' has proven worse than the bite in each of those precedent instances. The future is uncertain, but the probabilities favor a V-shaped rebound, starting this week.

US stocks bottom during the week of 29 November 2021 and stage a V-shaped rebound, rallying into year-end 2021.

Made on
2021-11-29
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5
Effect on score
+2.27

What counted as right

Status
resolved
Settled on
2021-12-31

Both legs must hold: (a) the S&P 500's lowest closing level over 2021-11-29 to 2021-12-31 occurs during the week of 2021-11-29 to 2021-12-03, and (b) the index's 2021-12-31 close is at least 3% above that low (a V-shaped rebound into year-end).

Outcome evidence only; no outcome value assigned. Both legs of the written criterion are satisfied on official closing levels: (a) the window's lowest close, 4,513.04, occurred on 2021-12-01, inside the specified week of 2021-11-29 to 2021-12-03; (b) the 2021-12-31 close of 4,766.18 is +5.61% above that low, clearing the 3% bar. Transparency caveat worth carrying forward: the path was not a single clean V. After the 12-01 trough the index recovered to 4,712.02 by 12-10, dipped again to 4,568.02 on 12-20 (a secondary trough just 1.22% above the first), then rallied hard into year-end. A stricter 'no material retest' reading of 'V-shaped' would be arguable, but the criterion as written is mechanical and both legs hold. Independent corroboration: Interactive Brokers weekly bars for CBOE SPX put the week of 2021-11-29 at a low of 4,495.12 versus 4,531.10 for the week of 2021-12-20, confirming the window's trough sat in the specified week; weekly closes 4,538.43 (week of 11-29) and 4,766.18 (week of 12-27) match the daily series exactly. No conflicting credible evidence found.

Sources

  • Fundstrat's Tom Lee, among the first to call the market's 2020 rebound, says he would be an aggressive buyer here

    CNBC ·

    Source

Evidence of what happened

  • Leg (a) — S&P 500 daily closes from 2021-11-29 to 2021-12-31: 4,655.27 (11-29), 4,567.00 (11-30), 4,513.04 (12-01), 4,577.10 (12-02), 4,538.43 (12-03), then 4,591.67, 4,686.75, 4,701.21, 4,667.45, 4,712.02, 4,668.97, 4,634.09, 4,709.85, 4,668.67, 4,620.64, 4,568.02 (12-20), 4,649.23, 4,696.56, 4,725.79, 4,791.19, 4,786.35, 4,793.06, 4,778.73, 4,766.18 (12-31). The lowest close of the whole window is 4,513.04 on 2021-12-01, which falls inside the week of 2021-11-29 to 2021-12-03. The lowest close outside that week was 4,568.02 on 2021-12-20, 1.22% above the 12-01 trough.

    Evidence

  • Leg (b) — the 2021-12-31 close of 4,766.18 is 5.61% above the 2021-12-01 window low close of 4,513.04, exceeding the 3% rebound threshold written into the criterion. The index also set its highest close of 2021 (4,793.06) on 2021-12-29 during that rally, i.e. the recovery ran into year-end rather than fading.

    Evidence

  • Wikipedia's S&P 500 annual performance table shows the index finished 2021 up 26.89% for the year, consistent with a 4,766.18 year-end close reached after the early-December trough rather than a year that ended near its December lows.

    Evidence

Corrections

No public corrections.

Effect on the score

+2.27
How sure they sounded
65%
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5

This page shows the scored prediction as published; the site doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Where this came from

US stocks bottom during the week of 29 November 2021 and st…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
August 5, 2026
Made on
2021-11-29

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodologyPrivacy