Full record

Hiteconomy

US wage inflation accelerates over the next couple of years regardless of which party wins the 2016 election.

A scored prediction by Tom Lee, made on .

InterviewQuote from the original sourceeconomy

Scored prediction

Hiteconomy

I think whether it's a Republican or Democratic president fiscal's loose, things gonna come, that's good for wages and that's good for inflation which helps S&P revenues

US wage inflation accelerates over the next couple of years regardless of which party wins the 2016 election.

Made on
2016-10-31
Outcome
Hit
Importance
4 / 5
Effect on score
+3.02

What counted as right

Status
resolved
Settled on
2019-10-31

TRUE if, at some point on or before 2019-10-31, US average hourly earnings year-over-year growth prints above its October 2016 level (about 2.8%) AND a core inflation measure (core CPI or core PCE, year over year) also prints above its October 2016 level. Wages accelerate but inflation does not (or vice versa) = PARTIAL; neither exceeds its 2016 level = FALSE.

Both legs of the AND condition are met, and by wide margins on the wage leg. Wages: 2.78% (Oct 2016) -> 3.55% peak (Feb 2019). Core inflation: core CPI 2.21% -> 2.34% peak; core PCE 1.78% -> 2.04% peak. The two legs were simultaneously above their Oct 2016 levels as early as May 2018 (AHE +2.94%, core CPI +2.27%) and again around Nov-Dec 2018 (AHE +3.39/+3.49%, core CPI +2.22/+2.25%, core PCE +2.01/+2.04%). resolved_on is set to the deadline (window close) because the criterion is an 'at some point on or before' test and the full-window data confirms it; earliest simultaneous satisfaction was May 2018 data (published Jun 2018). CAVEAT: figures above are current-vintage (revised) FRED data pulled 2026. As-first-printed values point the same way and are not marginal on the wage leg — AHE printed 2.8% for Oct 2016 and peaked at a 3.4% print (Feb 2019); core CPI printed 2.1% for Oct 2016 and printed 2.4% in Jul 2018 and again Sep/Oct 2019; core PCE printed about 1.7% for Oct 2016 and reached 2.0% in 2018. The core-inflation leg is the narrower of the two (roughly 0.1-0.3pp of headroom) but is confirmed independently by both core CPI and core PCE. No credible contrary evidence found.

Sources

  • Tom Lee: Wage Growth Picking Up, Impacting The Market | Trading Nation

    CNBC (YouTube) ·

    Source

Evidence of what happened

  • BLS baseline: average hourly earnings for all private employees rose 2.8% over the year ended October 2016 — matching the criterion's stated ~2.8% October 2016 reference level.

    Evidence

  • BLS/FRED series CES0500000003 (avg hourly earnings, total private). Computed YoY: Oct 2016 = +2.78%. Within the window the series rose well above that level, peaking at +3.55% in Feb 2019; it was above the Oct 2016 level continuously from Mar 2018 (+2.83%) through the Oct 2019 deadline (+3.18%). WAGE LEG SATISFIED.

    Evidence

  • BLS/FRED series CPILFESL (core CPI, all items less food and energy). Computed YoY: Oct 2016 = +2.21%. Exceeded within the window — May 2018 +2.27%, Jul 2018 +2.27%, and rising into the deadline: Aug 2019 +2.32%, Sep 2019 +2.33%, Oct 2019 +2.34% (window peak). CORE-INFLATION LEG SATISFIED on core CPI.

    Evidence

  • BEA/FRED series PCEPILFE (core PCE price index). Computed YoY: Oct 2016 = +1.78%. Exceeded within the window — Jul 2018 +2.00%, Nov 2018 +2.01%, Dec 2018 +2.04% (window peak). CORE-INFLATION LEG ALSO SATISFIED on the alternative core PCE measure.

    Evidence

Corrections

No public corrections.

Effect on the score

+3.02
How sure they sounded
65%
Outcome
Hit
Importance
4 / 5

This page shows the scored prediction as published; the site doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Where this came from

US wage inflation accelerates over the next couple of years…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
August 5, 2026
Made on
2016-10-31

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodologyPrivacy