Prediction record

Hitpolitics

Water allocation in the American Southwest will be a major, unavoidable political conflict over the next few years.

A scored record for Peter Zeihan, made on .

VideoPrimary sourcepolitics

Scored record

Hitpolitics

this is going to be an ugly ugly political issue for the next few years that is absolutely unavoidable but is absolutely critical if the United States in general in this region in specific is going to take it advantage of the demographic and geopolitical shifts that are racking our world right now

Water allocation in the American Southwest will be a major, unavoidable political conflict over the next few years.

Made on
2023-04-14
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5
Contribution
+2.99

Criterion

Resolution status
resolved
Resolved on
2026-04-14

Within ~2023-2026, American Southwest water allocation becomes a prominent, contested political conflict (e.g. interstate dispute, federal intervention, or litigation over Colorado River water).

Written criterion: 'Within ~2023-2026, American Southwest water allocation becomes a prominent, contested political conflict (e.g. interstate dispute, federal intervention, or litigation over Colorado River water).' Clearly met: a sustained, high-profile Upper-vs-Lower-Basin interstate dispute over Colorado River allocation, multiple missed federal deadlines, active Interior/Reclamation intervention via the post-2026 NEPA process with a threatened federally-imposed plan, and a looming Supreme Court litigation threat — all within the window and still live at the deadline (April 14, 2026). No outcome value assigned (later stage). resolved_on = deadline.

Sources

  • The Water Crisis in the American Southwest || Peter Zeihan

    YouTube ·

    Source

Outcome evidence

  • Multi-year, prominent interstate political conflict over Colorado River water allocation throughout 2023-2026: the seven basin states (Upper Basin — CO, WY, UT, NM; Lower Basin — AZ, NV, CA) are fractured over who absorbs cuts for the post-2026 operating guidelines. Lower Basin offered ~1.25M acre-feet/yr in cuts; Upper Basin refused mandatory cuts (citing lack of legal authority). ~40M people, 5.5M acres of farmland and a $1.4T economy depend on the river. (Water Education Foundation / PBS NewsHour coverage of the negotiations and sticking points.)

    Evidence

  • Federal intervention and missed deadlines: the Interior Department / Bureau of Reclamation set a Nov 11, 2025 deadline (final details due Feb 2026) for a seven-state deal and warned Interior could 'step in to decide how to impose cuts' if states failed. States MISSED the Nov 11, 2025 deadline AND a Feb 14, 2026 deadline. Reclamation published a draft Environmental Impact Statement (Jan 2026) with action alternatives that would all cut water supplies, advancing the Post-2026 NEPA process toward finalized operating guidelines by Oct 1, 2026 (current guidelines lapse Sept 2026).

    Evidence

  • Explicit litigation / Supreme Court risk and ongoing stalemate into 2026: experts warn that absent a deal, Reclamation imposing one of its alternatives 'could lead to decades of litigation going up to the Supreme Court'; Arizona pressed the federal government to order water cuts. Coverage from Jan-Feb 2026 (Arizona Mirror, Deseret, Colorado Sun) documents the continuing, openly contested interstate dispute. This squarely satisfies 'prominent, contested political conflict (interstate dispute, federal intervention, or litigation over Colorado River water).'

    Evidence

Corrections

No public corrections.

Score contribution

+2.99
Confidence
97%
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5
Contribution
+2.99

This page displays the scored record as published; the website doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Provenance

Water allocation in the American Southwest will be a major,…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
July 4, 2026
Made on
2023-04-14

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodology