Prediction record

Hiteconomy

US credit conditions will be somewhat easier in 2025 than the tightest point of this cycle (i.e. the cycle's tightest credit is behind us as of Oct 2024).

A scored record for Lyn Alden, made on .

BlogPrimary sourceeconomy

Scored record

Hiteconomy

we've seen the tightest credit situation for this cycle, and that 2025 will be a bit easier

US credit conditions will be somewhat easier in 2025 than the tightest point of this cycle (i.e. the cycle's tightest credit is behind us as of Oct 2024).

Made on
2024-10-31
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5
Contribution
+2.76

Criterion

Resolution status
resolved
Resolved on
2025-12-31

US credit conditions in 2025 are, on balance, easier than the tightest point of the 2022-2024 cycle — operationalized as credit spreads and/or a bank lending-standards measure (e.g. Fed SLOOS) showing net easing versus the cycle's tightest reading, rather than reaching a new cycle-tight extreme during 2025.

Criterion allows credit spreads AND/OR a bank lending-standards measure. Credit spreads clearly satisfy it: 2025 HY OAS (year-end 2.81%, most of year <3%) was far easier than the 2022-2024 cycle's tightest, and the lone April-2025 spike to 4.61% did NOT reach a new cycle-tight extreme (2022 peak ~6%, Mar-2023 ~5.3% were wider). The lending-standards leg is more mixed (SLOOS showed some modest net tightening in 2025) but nowhere near a new cycle extreme, and far milder than the 2022-2023 peak. On balance the record resolves TRUE ('cycle's tightest credit is behind us' / 2025 easier than the tightest point). Caveat logged: the April-2025 tariff-shock spread spike and residual SLOOS tightening are the strongest disconfirming signals but neither set a new cycle-tight extreme. 2022 HY OAS peak sourced from established series history (FRED public CSV is limited to a trailing ~3-year window, so pre-2023 dailies could not be re-pulled directly; the ~5.9-6.0% 2022 peak and ~5.3% Mar-2023 peak are well-documented). No outcome value (o) assigned; scoring is downstream.

Sources

  • October 2024 Newsletter

    Lyn Alden Investment Strategy ·

    Source

Outcome evidence

  • ICE BofA US High Yield OAS (FRED BAMLH0A0HYM2): 2025 spent most of the year very tight — minimum 2.59% (Jan 22, 2025), year-end 2.81% (Dec 31, 2025), well inside easy territory and near multi-decade tights. This is far tighter (easier credit) than the 2022-2024 cycle's tightest-credit (widest-spread) readings.

    Evidence

  • 2025's widest HY OAS reading was 4.61% on 2025-04-07 (a brief tariff-shock spike). The 2022-2024 cycle's tightest-credit episodes were wider still — the 2022 rate-shock peak (~5.9-6.0% mid-2022) and the March-2023 regional-bank stress (~5.3%). So even 2025's worst moment did NOT reach a new cycle-tight (new spread-wide) extreme relative to 2022-2024; on balance credit spreads showed clear net easing versus the cycle's tightest reading.

    Evidence

  • Fed SLOOS 2025: banks reported only modest net tightening of C&I lending standards in parts of 2025 (e.g., Q3 2025 'modest net shares' tightening), with standards overall having eased since 2024 for most categories — a materially milder posture than the 2022-2023 cycle peak, when net-tightening shares reached roughly the +40% to +50% range.

    Evidence

Corrections

  • Quote wording: Source includes 'that' after 'and'; restore for exact verbatim fidelity (tail truncation is an acceptable excerpt).

Score contribution

+2.76
Confidence
80%
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5
Contribution
+2.76

This page displays the scored record as published; the website doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Provenance

US credit conditions will be somewhat easier in 2025 than t…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
July 6, 2026
Made on
2024-10-31

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodology