Full record

Missmarkets

ETH/BTC begins an uptrend / finds strength in Q1 2025, regardless of BTC/USD direction

A scored prediction by Benjamin Cowen, made on .

VideoQuote from the original sourcemarkets

Scored prediction

Missmarkets

eth Bitcoin will start to find strength in q1 of 2025

ETH/BTC begins an uptrend / finds strength in Q1 2025, regardless of BTC/USD direction

Made on
2024-12-21
Outcome
Miss
Importance
3 / 5
Effect on score
+1.18

What counted as right

Status
resolved
Settled on
2025-03-31

The ETH/BTC ratio establishes an uptrend (a higher low followed by higher highs, net gain over the quarter) during Q1 2025.

Criterion (uptrend = higher low then higher highs, net gain over Q1) not met: ETH/BTC posted a large net loss and made new multi-year lows during Q1 2025. The sharp rebound occurred later in 2025 (post-Q1), outside the window. No outcome value assigned.

Sources

  • ETH / BTC

    YouTube ·

    Source

Evidence of what happened

  • ETH/BTC fell sharply in Q1 2025: ETH dropped ~38% (worst Q1 underperformance vs BTC since 2018) while BTC fell only ~6.5%. The ratio hit its lowest level since May 2020, i.e. a downtrend with lower lows, not the higher-low/higher-high uptrend the criterion requires.

    Evidence

  • ETH/BTC continued weak into April 2025, bottoming near multi-year lows around the 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil before a later-2025 rebound — confirming no uptrend was established during Q1.

    Evidence

Corrections

No public corrections.

Effect on the score

+1.18
How sure they sounded
55%
Outcome
Miss
Importance
3 / 5

This page shows the scored prediction as published; the site doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Where this came from

ETH/BTC begins an uptrend / finds strength in Q1 2025, rega…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
August 2, 2026
Made on
2024-12-21

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodologyPrivacy