Prediction record

Misscrypto

Ethereum closes 2023 below its yearly open

A scored record for Benjamin Cowen, made on .

VideoPrimary sourcecryptomarkets

Scored record

Misscrypto

will it also occur this time? I think that's sort of the question, and it could be, it could very well be a likely outcome

Ethereum closes 2023 below its yearly open

Made on
2023-08-05
Outcome
Miss
Importance
3 / 5
Contribution
+0.46

Criterion

Resolution status
resolved
Resolved on
2023-12-31

ETH's 2023-12-31 close is below its 2023 yearly open

Criterion 'ETH 2023-12-31 close below its 2023 yearly open' was NOT met — close $2,281.47 >> open ~$1,196. Objectively determinable from exchange/aggregator closing data. (No o/score assigned.)

Sources

  • Ethereum: Year-To-Date ROI

    YouTube ·

    Source

Outcome evidence

  • ETH's 2023 yearly open was ~$1,195–$1,200 (Jan 1 2023 open ~$1,195). ETH's 2023-12-31 close was $2,281.47 — nearly double the yearly open, i.e. ETH closed the year ABOVE, not below, its yearly open (up ~90% on the year).

    Evidence

  • Confirming yearly-open figure: ETH opened Jan 1 2023 around $1,195 per historical daily data.

    Evidence

Corrections

  • tags: ETH is a cryptocurrency; a scoreable crypto price/level bet takes 'crypto' as primary with 'markets' secondary, else the miss is mis-attributed in sub-scores.

Score contribution

+0.46
Confidence
65%
Outcome
Miss
Importance
3 / 5
Contribution
+0.46

This page displays the scored record as published; the website doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Provenance

Ethereum closes 2023 below its yearly open
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
July 18, 2026
Made on
2023-08-05

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodology