Full record

Hitcrypto

Bitcoin returns to its ~$20,000 regression fair value within about 15 months

A scored prediction by Benjamin Cowen, made on .

VideoQuote from the original sourcecryptomarkets

Scored prediction

Hitcrypto

we're going to get to the fair value of bitcoin at 20k maybe in about you know 15 months or so

Bitcoin returns to its ~$20,000 regression fair value within about 15 months

Made on
2020-07-15
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5
Effect on score
+2.86

What counted as right

Status
resolved
Settled on
2020-12-16

Bitcoin reaches $20,000 at some point by 2021-10-15

Criterion (BTC reaches $20,000 by 2021-10-15) is met; first crossing on 2020-12-16. No outcome value assigned.

Sources

  • Bitcoin: A Story of Bubbles

    YouTube ·

    Source

Evidence of what happened

  • Bitcoin broke above $20,000 for the first time ever on 2020-12-16 — roughly 5 months after the 2020-07-15 prediction and well inside the ~15-month window ending 2021-10-15.

    Evidence

  • Independent confirmation of the same 2020-12-16 milestone (BTC passed $20K and reached an all-time high).

    Evidence

Corrections

  • tags: Crypto-vs-markets rule: a Bitcoin price bet takes 'crypto' primary, 'markets' secondary.
  • horizon type: The pundit explicitly stated the '15 months' duration; that is a stated horizon, not an inference from the deadline table. Deadline value 2021-10-15 unchanged.

Effect on the score

+2.86
How sure they sounded
85%
Outcome
Hit
Importance
3 / 5

This page shows the scored prediction as published; the site doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Where this came from

Bitcoin returns to its ~$20,000 regression fair value withi…
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
August 2, 2026
Made on
2020-07-15

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodologyPrivacy