Full record

Misscrypto

Bitcoin does not reach $20,000 / a new all-time high in 2020

A scored prediction by Benjamin Cowen, made on .

VideoQuote from the original sourcecryptomarkets

Scored prediction

Misscrypto

โ€œI don't think we're gonna get to 20,000 this year if we do I would love itโ€

Bitcoin does not reach $20,000 / a new all-time high in 2020

Made on
2020-03-29
Outcome
Miss
Importance
3 / 5
Effect on score
+0.46

What counted as right

Status
resolved
Settled on
2020-12-16

BTC does not reach $20,000 or a new all-time high at any point during 2020

Criterion (BTC does not reach $20,000 or a new ATH at any point during 2020) was decisively contradicted: BTC hit both within the window, on 2020-12-16.

Sources

  • Bitcoin: The evidence for lengthening cycles

    YouTube ยท

    Source

Evidence of what happened

  • Bitcoin broke above $20,000 for the first time in history around 08:30 EST on Dec 16, 2020, reaching ~$20,817 โ€” a fresh all-time high. Both the $20,000 level AND a new ATH (prior 2017 ATH ~$19,783) were exceeded, and BTC continued to ~$28,000-29,000 by year-end.

    Evidence

  • Forbes corroboration: 'Bitcoin Breaks Through $20,000 To Hit A Fresh All-Time High' (Dec 16, 2020).

    Evidence

Corrections

  • tags: A Bitcoin price call takes crypto as primary, markets secondary.

Effect on the score

+0.46
How sure they sounded
65%
Outcome
Miss
Importance
3 / 5

This page shows the scored prediction as published; the site doesn't recompute or adjust the score.

Where this came from

Bitcoin does not reach $20,000 / a new all-time high in 2020
Methodology version
v1.0.0
Last computed
August 2, 2026
Made on
2020-03-29

How this profile was built

  1. Scored by independent judges

  2. Predictions gathered and sourced

  3. Independently verified against sources

Every public score traces back to sourced prediction records.

Avow is an independent project. The pundits scored here are not affiliated with Avow and do not endorse it. Names and likenesses are used for identification and commentary.

Evidence firstMethodologyPrivacy